|
1. Historical antecedents. Myth or reality in improvised bertsolaritza 2. The transformation of bertsolaritza in the XX century: the dominance of the improvised bertso
I. SOCIOCULTURAL REALITY AND PRESENT-DAY BERTSOLARITZA
|
To date,
and almost without exception, bertsolaritza has been considered as a sub-genre
of Basque popular literature. Basque literature, as such, also referred
to as written or Basque literary culture, is, or at least has been until
the beginnings of the XX century, scant and seen as anachronistic and
purely secondary.
Nevertheless,
the title Basque popular literature is a form of pigeon-holing
of anything that has not fitted into the classification of written literature(2).
Basque popular literature is thus identified by the heterogeneity of genres
and expressions which it manifests. In the first
place, heterogeneity of genres, the popular literature taking in poetry,
theatre, narrative and other, not so easily classifiable genres such as
refrains and idioms. Finally,
there is great heterogeneity in the aesthetic (literary, artistic) meaning
amongst all the manifestations of Basque popular literature. Idioms and,
to a great extent, proverbs, too derive only and exclusively from
the linguistic competence of the speakers, without any conscious awareness
of their aesthetic value. Given such
a heterogeneous panorama, it is clear that it is almost impossible to
establish a single valid method of analysis for all the manifestations
of Basque popular literature. As is well known, research proceeds in a
manner which increasingly fragments its targets of analysis, and it would
be no bad thing to take this into account when taking on the research
into Basque popular literature. Not to proceed in this way would result
in difficulties in a full understanding of the meaning and the value of
each one of the various manifestations which make up Basque popular literature. This book attempts to be nothing other than a thorough exposition of improvised bertsolaritza and a first step in the drawing up of a suitable method for its analysis, given the fact that current models are inadequate for the understanding of the specific complexity of this extempore artistic activity. This is precisely why we expressly do not analyse non-improvised bertsolaritza, not because we consider this unimportant but, as we believe it to be a radically different genre and, as such, requiring another method for analysis. |